经常喝蜂蜜水有什么好处和坏处| 什么是gay| 66什么意思| 上海最高楼叫什么大厦有多少米高| 金刚是什么意思| 梦到吃花生是什么意思| 鹅蛋不能和什么一起吃| 球是什么生肖| 20年是什么年| 高血糖喝什么茶好| 总出汗是什么原因| 肝右叶钙化灶什么意思| 喝什么茶去湿气最好| 番茄酱和番茄沙司有什么区别| 少量盆腔积液是什么意思| 因势利导什么意思| 女性胆固醇高吃什么| 什么叫肺结节| 励精图治是什么意思| 送老爸什么礼物| 白痰多是什么原因| 人绒毛膜促性腺激素是查什么的| 不敢苟同是什么意思| 血脂稠是什么原因造成的| 脸上长癣是什么原因造成的| lv中文名叫什么| 水银中毒会出现什么状况| 同什么协什么| 珏字五行属什么| 浅卡其色裤子配什么颜色上衣| 色令智昏是什么意思| 阴道干涩吃什么药| 什么样的嘴巴| tc什么意思| 什么汤什么火| 荸荠读音是什么| 塬字五行属什么| 结肠炎是什么原因引起的| 背疼挂什么科室最好| 黄芪什么季节喝最好| 3月27日是什么星座| 血凝是什么意思| 端水是什么意思| 化疗为什么要剃光头| 六月初三是什么日子| 吃斋是什么意思| 锴字五行属什么| 脚痒用什么药好| 饕餮是什么| 手腕发麻是什么原因| 萎缩性胃炎什么症状| 反物质是什么| 非营利性医院是什么意思| 蛊是什么| 吃什么能马上晕倒住院| 头疼是什么原因引起| 卿本佳人什么意思| 特点是什么| 全麦粉是什么面粉| 头晕想吐是什么原因| 限高什么意思| 12月24是什么星座| 尿常规红细胞高是什么原因| 耳根子软是什么意思| 吃什么补血小板快| 下缘达宫颈内口是什么意思| 莓茶属于什么茶| 宁波有什么特产| 胰腺疼吃什么药| 心脏缺血吃什么补的快| 阴虚火旺吃什么好| 肝病看什么科室| 副旅长是什么军衔| 经常流鼻血是什么病| 春饼卷什么菜好吃| bpa是什么| 为什么心细的男人危险| 穿什么内衣好| 鼻子发干是什么原因造成的| 什么样的毛刺是良性的| 玛雅文明是古代什么文明的代表| 七九年属什么生肖| 孕妇奶粉什么时候开始喝最好| 三油甘脂是什么| iphone的i是什么意思| 迷茫什么意思| 沙示汽水有什么功效| 尿很臭是什么原因女性| 哀鸿遍野什么意思| 什么是修辞手法| 备孕去医院挂什么科| 卵子排出体外是什么样子| 胃病挂什么科| 灌注治疗是什么意思| 胸部有硬块挂什么科| 贫血有什么症状| 金风玉露是什么意思| 结婚9年是什么婚| 什么的迎春花| 视网膜病变有什么症状| 为什么一年比一年热| aq是什么| cod表示什么| 高锰酸钾是什么| 男外科都检查什么| 糖尿病吃什么菜最好| 做梦梦见猪是什么意思| 灿烂的近义词是什么| 梦到两条蛇预示着什么| 先天性心脏病最怕什么| 让我随你去让我随你去是什么歌| 缺铁性贫血严重会导致什么后果| 花哨是什么意思| 按摩有什么好处和坏处| 不妄作劳什么意思| 呼吁是什么意思| 来例假肚子疼是什么原因| 荷尔蒙分泌是什么意思| 胚胎是什么| 瑄字五行属什么| 什么地爬| 什么药可以治早迣| 肚子胀是什么原因引起的| 月经期头疼是什么原因| 放屁很臭是什么原因| 陈慧琳属什么生肖| 软装是什么| 洋辣子学名叫什么| 什么姿势最舒服| 什么驴技穷成语| 阴道内痒是什么原因| 骨头坏死是什么原因造成的| 贫血吃什么补得快| 左眉毛上有痣代表什么| 胃热吃什么| 边际贡献是什么意思| gd是什么元素| 吃马齿菜有什么好处| 婴儿大便有泡沫是什么原因| 甲状腺彩超能查出什么| 反酸是什么原因| 牙疼吃什么药止痛快| 除草剂中毒有什么症状| 茄子吃多了有什么坏处| 户口本丢了有什么危害| 肾结石去医院挂什么科| 梦见弟媳妇是什么预兆| 红色加黄色等于什么颜色| 六指是什么原因导致的| 普惠幼儿园是什么意思| 全友床垫属于什么档次| 直博生是什么意思| ofd是什么意思| 什么的后羿| 为什么感冒药吃了想睡觉| 08属什么生肖| 中位生存期什么意思| 耳鸣和脑鸣有什么区别| 骨质增生吃什么药最好| fish是什么意思| 龙肉指的是什么肉| 六角龙鱼吃什么| 同型半胱氨酸查什么| 血糖高饮食需要注意什么| 腰椎骨质增生是什么意思| 日落胭脂红的下一句是什么| 吃什么食物对肝好| 什么是高潮| 今年37岁属什么生肖| TA什么意思| 激光脱毛和冰点脱毛有什么区别| 低密度是什么意思| 一什么粽子| 鸭子喜欢吃什么食物| 广东有什么城市| 口腔有味道是什么原因| 支那人什么意思| 什么补钾最快| 幺蛾子是什么意思| 家里放什么最招财| 为什么会打呼噜| 翻盘是什么意思| dtc什么意思| 肉刺用什么药膏能治好| 掐是什么意思| nerdy是什么牌子| 皮肤科挂什么科| 结核抗体弱阳性什么意思| 右耳朵耳鸣是什么原因| 中国梦是什么意思| 舒肝解郁胶囊治什么病| 含量是什么意思| 奶头痛是什么原因| 小苏打是什么| 39年属什么生肖| 七月生日是什么星座| 隆鼻后吃什么消肿快| 奴才模样是什么生肖| 全腹部ct平扫主要检查什么| 蛇什么时候出来活动| 晚上睡觉阴部外面为什么会痒| 游字五行属什么| 三番四次是什么生肖| 淋巴细胞百分比低说明什么问题| 什么是抗体| resp是什么| 1953年属什么生肖| kiki是什么意思| 三月十三是什么星座| 烂舌头是什么原因| 井柏然原名叫什么| 费玉清为什么不结婚| 自投罗网是什么意思| 血压高是什么原因| 扁平疣是什么病| 塑料袋是什么垃圾| 耳膜炎是什么症状| 珍珠五行属什么| 老年人吃什么增强免疫力| 女人肺气虚吃什么补最快| 白毫银针是什么茶| 包皮什么年龄割最好| 克罗心是什么意思| 官杀旺是什么意思| 黑匣子是什么颜色| 59年属什么生肖| 什么是绿茶女| 荆条是什么意思| 输尿管不扩张什么意思| 肾虚吃什么食物能补| p5是什么意思| 小恙是什么意思| 黄芪什么时候种植| 顺产和剖腹产有什么区别| 得艾滋病的前兆是什么| 馐什么意思| 很多屁放是什么原因| 咽喉炎吃什么消炎药| 左边小腹痛什么原因女| 什么是呼吸性碱中毒| 大口什么字| 阴道b超检查什么| electrolux是什么牌子| 百白破是预防什么的| 尿液发绿是什么原因| 花柳病是什么病| 不孕不育有什么症状女| 心衰的症状是什么| 11月10号是什么星座| 零和游戏是什么意思| 泌尿内科主要看什么病| 减持是什么意思| 什么是华人| 胆结石是什么原因导致的| 掉头发挂什么科| 胃火旺吃什么中成药| 麻批是什么意思| 祸水什么意思| 口苦吃什么药| 温良是什么意思| 甲钴胺有什么副作用| 什么是宫刑| 格林是什么意思| 部分空蝶鞍是什么意思| 百度Jump to content

《厉害了,我的国》首映 光影记录彰显大国实力

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Wikimedia Foundation Universal Code of Conduct

1. UCoC Enforcement Guidelines

These Enforcement Guidelines describe how the community and Wikimedia Foundation achieve the goals of the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC). This includes, among other topics: promoting understanding of the UCoC, engaging in proactive work to prevent violations, developing principles for responsive work to UCoC violations, and supporting local enforcement structures.

The UCoC applies to all online and offline Wikimedia spaces. Therefore, enforcing the UCoC is a shared responsibility. In line with the movement principle of decentralisation, the UCoC should be enforced at the most relevant local level possible.

The Enforcement Guidelines provide a framework for the interaction of current and future enforcement structures, seeking to create the groundwork for an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC.

1.1 Translations of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines

The original version of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines is in English. It is translated into various languages used on Wikimedia projects. The Wikimedia Foundation makes its best efforts to have accurate translations. If any difference arises in the meaning between the English version and a translation, decisions by the U4C must be based on the English version.

1.2 Review of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee leads annual reviews of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines.

2. Preventive work

This section aims to provide guidelines for Wikimedia communities and affiliated individuals to be aware of the UCoC, to fully understand and adhere to it. To that end, this section details recommendations for raising awareness of the UCoC, handling translations of the UCoC, and promoting voluntary adherence to the UCoC where appropriate or necessary.

2.1 Notification and confirmation of the UCoC

The UCoC applies to everyone who interacts and contributes to Wikimedia projects. It also applies to official in-person events, and related spaces hosted on third party platforms as a baseline of behavior for collaboration on Wikimedia projects worldwide.

The UCoC is part of the Wikimedia Terms of Use.

Additionally, the following individuals need to confirm their adherence to the UCoC:

  • All Wikimedia Foundation staff and contractors, Board of Trustees members, Wikimedia affiliate board members and staff;
  • Any representative of a Wikimedia affiliate or aspiring Wikimedia affiliate (such as, but not limited to: an individual, or group of individuals who is seeking to promote and/or collaborate a Wikimedia sponsored event, group, study, either on or off-wiki in a research setting); and
  • Any individual who wants to use the Wikimedia Foundation trademark in an event such as, but not limited to: events branded with Wikimedia trademarks (such as by including them in the event's title) and representation of the Wikimedia organization, community, or project at an event (such as, but not limited to, a presenter or a booth operator).

2.1.1 Promoting UCoC awareness

In order to improve awareness, a link to the UCoC will be accessible on or at:

  • User and event registration pages;
  • Footers on Wikimedia projects and edit confirmation pages for logged-out users (where appropriate and technically possible);
  • Footers on the websites of recognized affiliates and user groups;
  • Prominently communicated at in-person, remote, and hybrid events; and
  • Anywhere else deemed appropriate by local projects, affiliates, user groups, and event organizers

2.2 Recommendations for UCoC training

The U4C, with support from the Wikimedia Foundation, develops and implements training to provide a common understanding of the UCoC and skills for its implementation. Relevant stakeholders must be consulted in the development of training, including, but not limited to: Affiliates, the Affiliations Committee, Arbitration Committees, Stewards and other Advanced Rights Holders, T&S and legal, and others as it deems beneficial to providing a complete view of the UCoC.

These trainings are for people who want to be part of UCoC enforcement processes, or those who want to be informed about the UCoC.

The training will be set up in independent modules covering general information, identification of violations and support, and complex cases and appeals. The U4C is responsible for maintaining and updating the training modules as needed.

Training modules will be available in different formats and on different platforms for easy access. Local communities and Wikimedia Affiliates who want to provide training at their community level will get financial support from the Wikimedia Foundation to implement training. This includes support for translations.

Participants who complete a module must have the option of having their completion publicly acknowledged.

The following sets of trainings are proposed:

Module A - Orientation (UCoC - General)

  • Help to ensure a common understanding of the UCoC and its implementation
  • Explain concisely what the UCoC is and its expected enforcement, as well as what tools are available to help report violations

Module B - Identification and Reporting (UCoC - Violations)

  • Give people the ability to identify UCoC violations, understand reporting processes and learn how to use reporting tools
  • Detail the type of violation, how to identify reportable instances in their local context, how and where to make reports, and optimal handling of cases within UCoC processes
  • Training will also focus on specific parts of the UCoC, such as harassment and abuses of power (as required)

Modules C - Complex cases, Appeals (UCoC - Multiple Violations, Appeals)

  • These modules are a prerequisite to joining the U4C, and are recommended for prospective U4C applicants and advanced rights holders
  • This module should cover two specific topics:
    • C1 - Handling complex cases (UCoC - Multiple Violations): Cover cross-wiki cases, long term harassment, identifying credibility of threats, effective and sensitive communication, and protecting the safety of victims and other vulnerable people
    • C2 - Handling appeals, closing cases (UCoC - Appeals): Cover handling UCoC appeals
  • These modules will be instructor-led and tailored trainings, provided to U4C members and applicants, and community-elected functionaries who have signed the Access to Nonpublic Personal Data Policy
  • When possible the materials for these instructor-led trainings, such as individual modules, slides, questions, etc., will be publicly available

3. Responsive work

This section aims to provide guidelines and principles for processing reports of UCoC violations, and recommendations for local enforcement structures dealing with UCoC violations. To that end, this section will detail important principles for processing reports, recommendations for the creation of a reporting tool, suggested enforcement for different levels of violations, and recommendations for local enforcement structures.

3.1 Principles for filing and processing of UCoC violations

The following principles are standards for reporting systems across the Movement.

Reports:

  • Reporting of UCoC violations should be possible by the target of the violation, as well as by uninvolved third parties that observed the incident
  • Reports shall be capable of covering UCoC violations, whether they happen online, offline, in a space hosted by a third party, or a mix of spaces
  • It must be possible for reports to be made publicly or with varying degrees of privacy
  • Credibility and verifiability of accusations will be investigated thoroughly to properly assess risk and legitimacy
  • Users who continually send bad faith or unjustified reports risk facing loss of reporting privileges
  • Accused individuals shall have access to the particulars of the alleged violation made against them unless such access would risk danger or likely harm to the reporter or others' safety
  • Where possible and necessary, the Wikimedia Foundation will provide translation resources for reports

Processing violations:

  • Outcomes shall be proportional to the severity of the violation
  • Cases shall be judged in an informed way, which makes use of context, in alignment with the principles of the UCoC
  • Cases shall be resolved within a consistent time frame, with timely updates provided to participants if it is prolonged

Transparency:

  • Where possible, the group that processed the UCoC violation will provide a public archive of those cases, while preserving privacy and security in non-public cases
  • The Wikimedia Foundation will publish basic statistics about usage of the central reporting tool proposed in section 3.2, while honoring the principles of minimal data collection and respect for privacy.
    • Other groups that process UCoC violations are encouraged to provide basic statistics about UCoC violations and reporting as they are able, while honoring the principles of minimal data collection and respect for privacy.

3.1.1 Providing resources for processing cases

Enforcement of the UCoC by local governance structures is supported in multiple ways. Communities choose from different mechanisms or approaches based on several factors such as: the capacity of their enforcement structures, approach to governance, and community preferences. Some of these approaches can include:

  • An Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) for a specific Wikimedia project
  • An ArbCom shared amongst multiple Wikimedia projects
  • Advanced rights holders enforcing local policies consistent with the UCoC in a decentralized manner
  • Panels of local administrators enforcing policies
  • Local contributors enforcing local policies through community discussion and agreement

Communities handle enforcement through existing means where they do not conflict with the UCoC.

3.1.2 Enforcement by type of violations

This section details a non-complete list of the different types of violations, along with the potential enforcement mechanism pertaining to it.

  • Violations involving threats of any sort of physical violence
    • Handled by the Wikimedia Trust & Safety team
  • Violations involving litigation or legal threats
    • Sent to the Wikimedia Foundation Legal team, or, when appropriate, other professionals who can appropriately evaluate the merit of the threats
  • Violations involving the nonconsensual disclosure of personally identifiable information
    • Generally handled by users with oversight or edit suppression permissions
    • Occasionally handled by Trust & Safety
    • Sent to the Wikimedia Foundation Legal team or, when appropriate, other professionals who can appropriately evaluate the merits of the case if this kind of violation invokes a legal obligation
  • Violations related to affiliate governance
    • Handled by the Affiliations Committee or equivalent body
  • Violations in technical spaces
    • Handled by Technical Code of Conduct Committee
  • Systemic failure to follow the UCoC
    • Handled by U4C
    • Some examples of systemic failure include:
      • Lack of local capacity to enforce the UCoC
      • Consistent local decisions that conflict with the UCoC
      • Refusal to enforce the UCoC
      • Lack of resources or lack of will to address issues
  • On-wiki UCoC violations
    • UCoC violations that happen across multiple wikis: Handled by global sysops and stewards and the bodies that handle single-wiki UCoC violations or handled by the U4C where they do not conflict with these guidelines
    • UCoC violations that happen on a single wiki: Handled by existing enforcement structures according to their existing guidelines, where they do not conflict with these guidelines
      • Simple UCoC violations such as vandalism should be handled by existing enforcement structures through existing means, where they do not conflict with these guidelines
  • Off-wiki violations
    • Handled by the U4C where no local governance structure (e.g. ArbCom) exists, or if the case is referred to them by the enforcement structure that would otherwise be responsible
    • In some cases, it is helpful to report the off-wiki violations to enforcement structures of the relevant off-wiki space. This does not preclude existing local and global enforcement mechanisms from acting on the reports
  • Violations at in-person events and spaces
    • Existing enforcement structures often provide rules of behavior and enforcement in off-wiki spaces. These include friendly space policies and conference rules
    • Enforcement structures handling these cases can refer them to the U4C
    • In instances of events hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, Trust & Safety provides event policy enforcement

3.2 Recommendations for a reporting tool

A centralized reporting and processing tool for UCoC violations will be developed and maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation. It will be possible to make reports through MediaWiki with this tool. The purpose is to lower the technical barrier for reporting and processing UCoC violations.

Reports should include relevant actionable information or provide a documentation record of the case at hand. The reporting interface should allow the reporter to provide details to whomever is responsible for processing that particular case. This includes information such as, but not limited to:

  • How the reported behavior violates the UCoC
  • Who or what has been harmed by this violation of the UCoC
  • The date and time at which the incident(s), occurred
  • The location(s) of the incident(s)
  • Other information to allow enforcement groups to best handle the matter

The tool should operate under the principles of ease-of-use, privacy and security, flexibility in processing, and transparency.

Individuals charged with enforcing the UCoC are not required to use this tool. They may continue to work with whatever tools they deem appropriate, as long as cases are handled according to the same principles of ease-of-use, privacy and security, flexibility in processing, and transparency.

3.3 Principles and recommendations for enforcement structures

Where possible, existing local enforcement structures have the responsibility of receiving reports of and dealing with UCoC violations, in accordance with the guidelines stated here. To ensure that enforcement of the UCoC remains consistent across the movement, the following baseline principles are applied when handling UCoC violations.

3.3.1 Fairness in process

Enforcement structures must develop and maintain supportive conflict-of-interest policies. These should help admins or others determine when to abstain or disengage from a report when they are closely involved in the issue.

All parties will usually have the opportunity to give their perspective on the issues and evidence, and feedback from others can also be invited to help provide more information, perspective, and context. This may be limited to protect privacy and safety.

3.3.2 Transparency of process

The U4C, in line with its purpose and scope as defined in 4.1, provides documentation on the effectiveness of UCoC enforcement actions and their relation to common violations throughout the movement, supported by the Wikimedia Foundation in conducting this research. The goal of this documentation is to aid enforcement structures in developing best practices for enforcing the UCoC.

Wikimedia projects and affiliates, when possible, shall maintain pages outlining policies and enforcement mechanisms in line with the UCoC policy text. Projects and affiliates with existing guidelines or policies in contradiction to the UCoC policy text should discuss changes to conform with global community standards. Updating or creating new local policies should be done in a way that does not conflict with the UCoC. Projects and affiliates may request advisory opinions from the U4C about potential new policies or guidelines.

For Wikimedia-specific conversations occurring on related space hosted on third party platforms (e.g. Discord, Telegram, etc.), Wikimedia's Terms of Use may not apply. They are covered by that specific website's Terms of Use and conduct policies. Nevertheless, the behavior of Wikimedians on related space hosted on third party platforms can be accepted as evidence in reports of UCoC violations. Wikimedia community members who moderate Wikimedia-related spaces on third party platforms are required to incorporate the UCoC into their policies. The Wikimedia Foundation encourages best practices for third-party platforms that discourage the continuation of on-wiki conflicts to their spaces.

3.3.3 Appeals

An action taken by an individual advanced rights holder will be appealable to a local or shared enforcement structure. Local communities may allow appeals to a different individual advanced rights holder. If no local enforcement structure exists, then an appeal to the U4C is permissible.

Enforcement structures set standards for accepting and considering appeals based on relevant contextual information and mitigating factors. These factors include, but are not limited to: verifiability of the accusations, the length and effect of the sanction, and whether there is a suspicion of abuse of power or other systemic issues, and the likelihood of further violations. The acceptance of an appeal is not guaranteed.

Appeals are not possible against certain decisions made by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department. However, some Wikimedia Foundation office actions and decisions are reviewable by the Case Review Committee. The limitation, specifically on appeals from office actions and decisions, may not apply in some jurisdictions, if legal requirements differ.

Enforcement structures should seek informed perspectives on cases in order to establish a basis to grant or decline an appeal. Information should be handled sensitively, with care for the privacy of the people involved and the decision-making process.

To achieve this goal, enforcement structures are encouraged to consider different factors when reviewing appeals. These may include, but not be limited to:

  • The severity and harm caused by the violation
  • Prior histories of violations
  • Severity of sanctions being appealed
  • Length of time since the violation
  • Analysis of the violation in contact
  • Suspicions of a possible abuse of power or other systemic issue

4. UCoC Coordinating Committee (U4C)

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a co-equal body with other high-level decision-making bodies (e.g. ArbComs and AffCom). Its purpose is to serve as final recourse in the case of systemic failures by local groups to enforce the UCoC.

4.1 Purpose and scope

The U4C monitors reports of UCoC breaches, and may conduct additional investigations and take actions where appropriate. The U4C will regularly monitor and assess the state of UCoC enforcement. It may suggest suitable changes to UCoC, the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines, and U4C Charter for the Wikimedia Foundation and the community to consider, but may not change these documents on its own. When necessary, the U4C will assist the Wikimedia Foundation in handling cases.

The U4C:

  • Handles complaints and appeals in the circumstances outlined in the Enforcement Guidelines
  • Performs any investigations necessary to resolve said complaints and appeals
  • Provide resources for communities on UCoC best practices, such as mandatory training material and other resources as needed
  • Provides a final interpretation of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines and the UCoC if the need arises, in collaboration with community members and enforcement structures
  • Monitors and assesses the effectiveness of UCoC enforcement, and provides recommendations for improvement

The U4C will not take cases that do not primarily involve violations of the UCoC, or its enforcement. The U4C's responsibilities are explained in the context of other enforcement structures in 3.1.2.

4.2 Selection, membership, and roles

Annual elections, organized by the global community, will select up to 16 voting members.

In exceptional circumstances, the U4C may call interim elections, if it determines that resignations or inactivity have created an immediate need for additional members. Elections will be in a format similar to that of the regular annual elections.

The Wikimedia Foundation may appoint up to two non-voting members to the U4C and will provide support staff as desired and appropriate.

4.3 Policy and precedent

The U4C does not create new policy and may not amend or change the UCoC. The U4C instead applies and enforces the UCoC as defined by its scope.

As community policies, guidelines and norms evolve over time, previous decisions will be taken into account only to the extent that they remain relevant in the current context.

5. Glossary

Administrator (sysop or admin)
See definition on Meta-Wiki.

Advanced rights holder
user who holds administrative rights above typical editing permissions, and is generally elected through community processes or appointed by Arbitration Committees. This includes, as a non-exhaustive list: local sysops / administrators, functionaries, global sysops, stewards.

Affiliations Committee or Affcom
See definition on Meta-Wiki.

Arbitration Committee or ArbCom
group of trusted users who serve as the final decision making group for some disputes. An ArbCom is considered a high-level decision making body only for the parts of the UCoC that are within its scope, as defined by its community. An ArbCom may serve more than one project (e.g. Wikinews and Wikivoyage) and/or more than one language. For the purposes of these guidelines, this includes the Code of Conduct Committee for Wikimedia Technical Spaces and administrative panels. See also the definition on Meta-Wiki.

Binding verbs
When drafting the Enforcement Guidelines, the drafting committee considered the words 'create', 'develop', 'enforce', 'must', 'produce', 'shall', and 'will' as binding. Compare this to recommendation verbs.

Case Review Committee
See definition on Meta-Wiki.

Community
Refers to a project's community. Decisions made by a project's community are generally determined by consensus. See also: Project.

Cross-wiki
Affecting or occurring on more than one project. See also: Global.

Event safety coordinator
a person designated by the organizers of an in-person Wikimedia-affiliated event as responsible for that event's safety and security.

Global
Referring to all Wikimedia projects. In the Wikimedia movement, "global" is a jargon term referring to Movement-wide governing bodies. It generally is used to contrast against "local".

Global sysops
See definition on Meta-Wiki.

High-level decision-making body
A group (i.e. U4C, ArbCom, AffCom, Stewards) beyond which there can be no appeal of UCoC enforcement. Different issues may have different high-level decision-making bodies. This term does not include a group of users participating in a discussion organized at a noticeboard and resulting in a decision, even if the results of that discussion cannot be appealed.

Local
Referring to a single Wikimedia project, affiliate, or organisation. This term usually refers to the smallest, most immediate governing body applicable to the situation.

Off-wiki
Generally refers to online spaces that are not hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, even if Wikimedia community members are present and actively using the space. Examples of off-wiki spaces include Twitter, WhatsApp, IRC, Telegram, Discord, and others.

Personally identifiable information
is any data that could potentially identify a specific individual. Any information that can be used to distinguish one person from another and can be used to deanonymize previously anonymous data is considered PII.

Project (Wikimedia project)
A wiki operated by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Recommendation verbs
When drafting the Enforcement Guidelines, the drafting committee considered the words 'encourage', 'may', 'propose', 'recommend', and 'should' as recommendations. Compare this to binding verbs.

Related space hosted on third party platforms
Websites, including private wikis, not operated by the Wikimedia Foundation but where users discuss project matters relevant to Wikimedia. Often moderated by Wikimedia volunteers.

Staff
Employees of and/or staff members assigned to a Wikimedia movement organization or contractors of such a movement organization whose work requires interaction with Wikimedia community members or in Wikimedia movement spaces (including third-party spaces such as off-wiki platforms dedicated to Wikimedia movement activity).

Steward
See definition on Meta-Wiki.

Systemic issue or failure
An issue for which there is a pattern of failing to follow the Universal Code of Conduct with participation of several people, particularly those with advanced rights.

Wikimedia Foundation Office Action Policy
The policy or its equivalent successor policy.
香菜不能和什么一起吃 脾胃湿热吃什么药 急性肾炎什么症状 cm医学上是什么意思 户籍是指什么
降头是什么意思 什么情况下做冠脉ct 脚气涂什么药膏 bf是什么意思 吃什么能排结石
caring什么意思 跨界是什么意思 痛风打什么针 发福是什么意思 肚脐眼为什么会有臭味
迦字五行属什么 为什么不建议做融合手术 治癜风擦什么药好的快 恶心呕吐吃什么药 什么油好
金牛属于什么象星座hcv9jop2ns3r.cn 看淡一切对什么都没兴趣hcv9jop5ns3r.cn 孕激素低吃什么补得快hcv8jop2ns9r.cn 至加秦是什么字hcv9jop1ns5r.cn 包皮手术挂什么科kuyehao.com
乌龙茶是什么茶hcv8jop3ns3r.cn 君山银针属于什么茶hcv7jop5ns5r.cn 1948年属什么hcv8jop1ns3r.cn 一笑泯恩仇什么意思hcv9jop1ns1r.cn 石敢当是什么神hcv8jop2ns4r.cn
药引是什么意思hcv8jop8ns4r.cn 包饺子什么意思hcv9jop1ns4r.cn 陆地上最大的动物是什么hcv8jop9ns4r.cn 克罗恩病吃什么药hcv9jop7ns2r.cn 为什么手术服是绿色的jasonfriends.com
faleda是什么牌子的手表ff14chat.com loves是什么意思hcv8jop4ns9r.cn 什么食物黄体酮含量高cj623037.com 身高别体重是什么意思hcv8jop9ns5r.cn 动容什么意思hcv8jop3ns1r.cn
百度